Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat : apply spring boot best practices #753

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rajadilipkolli
Copy link
Owner

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli commented Aug 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for virtual threads in the AWS Lambda project to enhance concurrency capabilities.
    • Introduced multiple new configuration properties in the AWS Lambda project to improve database interaction and performance tuning.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the class path for the Spring Boot application launch across multiple projects, which may improve startup behavior.
  • Documentation

    • Updated dependency management by excluding JUnit from various projects to avoid version conflicts and reduce dependency size.

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli self-assigned this Aug 31, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the Dockerfiles and pom.xml files across multiple AWS projects. The primary modification is the adjustment of the ENTRYPOINT class reference from org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher. Additionally, exclusions for the JUnit dependency are added in several pom.xml files, and new configuration properties related to Hibernate and SQL logging are introduced in the application.properties files.

Changes

Files Change Summary
aws-cloudwatch-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-cloudwatch-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
aws-dynamodb-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-dynamodb-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
aws-kinesis-project/consumer/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-kinesis-project/producer/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-lambda-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties Added multiple Hibernate and SQL configuration properties.
aws-lambda-project/src/test/java/com/learning/awslambda/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java Updated import and method for file path creation.
aws-parameterstore-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-s3-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-secretmanager-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-secretmanager-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
aws-ses-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-ses-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
aws-sns-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-sns-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
aws-sqs-project/Dockerfile Updated ENTRYPOINT from JarLauncher to launch.JarLauncher.
aws-sqs-project/pom.xml Added exclusion for junit in junit-jupiter dependency.
pom.xml Added <maven.compiler.release>21</maven.compiler.release>.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Docker as Docker Container
    participant App as Spring Boot Application

    User->>Docker: Start Container
    Docker->>App: Execute org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
    App-->>Docker: Application Running
    Docker-->>User: Container Running
Loading

🐇 In a world of code and jars,
I hop with joy beneath the stars.
From JarLauncher to launch we go,
With threads so light, our apps will glow!
Exclusions here, and properties there,
A sprightly dance in the software air! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07697fc and c5ab8f6.

Files selected for processing (20)
  • aws-cloudwatch-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-cloudwatch-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • aws-dynamodb-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-dynamodb-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • aws-kinesis-project/consumer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-kinesis-project/producer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-lambda-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
  • aws-lambda-project/src/test/java/com/learning/awslambda/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
  • aws-parameterstore-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-s3-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-secretmanager-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-secretmanager-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • aws-ses-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-ses-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • aws-sns-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-sns-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • aws-sqs-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • aws-sqs-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • pom.xml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • aws-lambda-project/src/test/java/com/learning/awslambda/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java
  • aws-secretmanager-project/pom.xml
  • aws-ses-project/pom.xml
Additional comments not posted (17)
aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1)

7-7: Approve the addition of the virtual threads property.

The addition of spring.threads.virtual.enabled=true is a good practice to enhance concurrency capabilities in environments that support virtual threads. However, ensure that the Spring version used in the project supports this property.

Run the following script to verify the Spring version:

Verification successful

Spring Boot version supports virtual threads.

The spring-boot-starter-parent version 3.3.3 in your pom.xml supports virtual threads, confirming the appropriateness of the spring.threads.virtual.enabled=true property. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Spring version in the `pom.xml` to ensure it supports virtual threads.

# Test: Search for the Spring version in `pom.xml`. Expect: Version that supports virtual threads.
cat aws-lambda-project/pom.xml | grep 'spring.version'

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for Spring dependencies in the `pom.xml` and extract their versions.

# Test: Search for common Spring dependencies and their versions.
grep -A 1 '<dependency>' aws-lambda-project/pom.xml | grep -E 'spring-(core|context|boot)' -A 1

Length of output: 97


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `pom.xml` file and search for Spring-related dependencies or properties.

# Locate the `pom.xml` file
fd -e xml -g 'pom.xml'

# Search for Spring-related dependencies or properties in the located `pom.xml` file
if [ -f aws-lambda-project/pom.xml ]; then
  grep -i 'spring' aws-lambda-project/pom.xml
fi

Length of output: 2410


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the Spring Boot version in the `pom.xml` file.

# Search for the `spring-boot-starter-parent` version in the `pom.xml` file
grep -A 1 'spring-boot-starter-parent' aws-lambda-project/pom.xml

Length of output: 158

aws-s3-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Approve the updated ENTRYPOINT class reference.

The change to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher likely aligns with updates in the Spring Boot framework. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project that utilize Spring Boot.

Run the following script to verify consistency across Dockerfiles:

Verification successful

Consistent ENTRYPOINT Across Dockerfiles Verified

The ENTRYPOINT using org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project. No discrepancies were found.

  • All Dockerfiles use: ENTRYPOINT ["java", "org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher"]
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ENTRYPOINT across all Dockerfiles in the project.

# Test: Search for the ENTRYPOINT in all Dockerfiles. Expect: Consistent use of the new class reference.
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep 'ENTRYPOINT'

Length of output: 1211

aws-ses-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Approve the updated ENTRYPOINT class reference.

The update to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is consistent with changes in the Spring Boot framework. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues specific to the AWS SES project.

Run the following script to verify the specific impact on the AWS SES project:

Verification successful

ENTRYPOINT Change Verified for AWS SES Project

The change to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher as the ENTRYPOINT is consistent with the project's Spring Boot version (3.3.3) and does not introduce any issues specific to the AWS SES project. The configuration aligns with standard practices for Spring Boot applications.

  • The Spring Boot version used is compatible with the JarLauncher.
  • No conflicting configurations or dependencies were found.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the specific impact of the ENTRYPOINT change on the AWS SES project.

# Test: Search for potential issues introduced by the new ENTRYPOINT. Expect: No issues related to the change.
echo "Manual testing or additional automated tests may be required to verify the impact."

Length of output: 174


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Spring Boot configuration files or documentation that might mention the ENTRYPOINT or related configurations.
rg 'ENTRYPOINT|JarLauncher' -A 5

# Check for the Spring Boot version used in the project to ensure compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT.
rg 'spring-boot' --glob '*.xml' --glob '*.properties' --glob '*.yml' -A 3

# Look for any custom scripts or Docker configurations that might be affected by this ENTRYPOINT change.
rg 'ENTRYPOINT' --glob '*.sh' --glob 'Dockerfile*' -A 5

Length of output: 31419

aws-sns-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change.

The change in the ENTRYPOINT to use org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is noted. While this update is likely in line with best practices or framework updates, it's crucial to ensure that it does not adversely affect the application's startup and runtime behavior.

Please conduct thorough testing to confirm that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT. This might include integration testing or smoke tests to verify that the application starts and runs correctly in its Dockerized environment.

aws-sqs-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change.

The update to the ENTRYPOINT using org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is consistent with the changes in other projects. Ensure that this modification aligns with the application's requirements and does not introduce any startup or runtime issues.

It is recommended to perform integration or smoke tests to confirm that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT setup.

aws-lambda-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change, especially for AWS Lambda.

The update to the ENTRYPOINT using org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher should be carefully evaluated, particularly because AWS Lambda has specific operational requirements. Ensure that this change is compatible with Lambda's execution model and does not affect the application's ability to start and run efficiently.

Conduct tests specific to AWS Lambda to ensure that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT. This might include deploying a test version to the Lambda environment to verify functionality.

aws-dynamodb-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Update to ENTRYPOINT is appropriate for Spring Boot best practices.

The change in the ENTRYPOINT from org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is aligned with the latest Spring Boot best practices. This should ensure a more robust handling of the application startup within Docker.

Please ensure that this new class path is correctly configured in your Spring Boot setup and test the Docker container to verify that the application initializes as expected.

aws-cloudwatch-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Consistent update to ENTRYPOINT across projects.

The update in the ENTRYPOINT from org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is consistent with the changes made in other projects. This consistency helps in maintaining a uniform approach to application deployment across different AWS projects.

As with the other projects, please verify that the new class path functions correctly and that the application starts without issues in the Docker environment.

aws-secretmanager-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Uniform ENTRYPOINT update enhances project consistency.

The ENTRYPOINT has been updated from org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher across multiple projects, including this one. This uniformity ensures that all projects benefit from the latest Spring Boot enhancements.

Ensure to test this Dockerfile as well to confirm that the application starts correctly and that the new ENTRYPOINT does not introduce any unexpected behavior.

aws-parameterstore-project/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Approved: Update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.

The update from org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher to org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher is noted. This change aligns with the latest organizational changes in the Spring Boot framework. Ensure that this update is compatible with the Spring Boot version used in your project.

Verification successful

Compatibility Verified: ENTRYPOINT Update in Dockerfile

The update to the ENTRYPOINT class reference in the Dockerfile is compatible with the Spring Boot version 3.3.3 used in the project. This change aligns with the latest organizational changes in the Spring Boot framework. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Spring Boot version compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT.

# Test: Check the Spring Boot version in the pom.xml or build.gradle files.
rg --type pom.xml --type gradle "spring-boot.version"

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for pom.xml and build.gradle files in the repository
fd -e xml -e gradle -e groovy -e kts -e properties

Length of output: 5015


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the Spring Boot version in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml file
rg "<spring-boot.version>" aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml

Length of output: 63


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any mention of "spring-boot" in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml file
rg "spring-boot" aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml

Length of output: 695


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the spring-boot-starter-parent section in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml
rg "<parent>" -A 5 aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml

Length of output: 290


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for properties that might define the Spring Boot version in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml
rg "<properties>" -A 10 aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml

Length of output: 654

aws-kinesis-project/consumer/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Approved: Consistent update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.

The ENTRYPOINT has been updated consistently across projects, reflecting a systematic application of best practices. As with the previous Dockerfile, ensure compatibility with the Spring Boot version used in your project.

Verification successful

ENTRYPOINT Compatibility Verified with Spring Boot Version 3.3.3

The ENTRYPOINT configuration in the Dockerfile is compatible with the Spring Boot version 3.3.3 specified in the aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml. No issues found with the update.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Spring Boot version compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT.

# Test: Check the Spring Boot version in the pom.xml or build.gradle files.
rg --type pom.xml --type gradle "spring-boot.version"

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate pom.xml and build.gradle files in the repository
fd -e xml -e gradle -e gradle.kts

# If any files are found, search for the Spring Boot version within them
fd -e xml -e gradle -e gradle.kts --exec rg "spring-boot.version" {}

Length of output: 2769


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Spring Boot-related dependencies or plugins in the aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml file
rg "spring-boot" aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml

Length of output: 696


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the parent section in the aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml to find the Spring Boot version
rg "<parent>" -A 5 aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml

Length of output: 292

aws-kinesis-project/producer/Dockerfile (1)

14-14: Approved: Uniform update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.

This change is part of a coordinated update across multiple projects to align with Spring Boot best practices. Ensure that this update is compatible with the Spring Boot version used in your project.

pom.xml (1)

15-15: Java Version Update Approved

The addition of <maven.compiler.release>21</maven.compiler.release> is approved as it specifies the project should be compiled with Java version 21. This may enable the use of newer language features and APIs introduced in Java 21.

Ensure compatibility with all libraries and frameworks used in the project, as this change might affect their behavior or compatibility.

aws-sqs-project/pom.xml (1)

133-138: JUnit Dependency Exclusion Approved

The addition of an exclusion block for the JUnit dependency within the junit-jupiter artifact is approved. This change helps prevent conflicts from multiple versions of JUnit being present, which can lead to unpredictable testing behavior.

Verify that the exclusion does not impact existing tests that may rely on JUnit directly.

aws-sns-project/pom.xml (1)

99-104: JUnit Dependency Exclusion Approved

The addition of an exclusion block for the JUnit dependency within the junit-jupiter artifact in the AWS SNS project is approved. This ensures consistency in dependency management across projects and helps prevent conflicts from multiple versions of JUnit.

Verify that the exclusion does not impact existing tests that may rely on JUnit directly, similar to the verification suggested for the SQS project.

aws-dynamodb-project/pom.xml (1)

112-117: Review the exclusion of JUnit dependency.

The addition of an <exclusions> block for the junit artifact under the junit-jupiter dependency is correctly formatted and placed. However, it's crucial to ensure that this exclusion does not unintentionally remove necessary testing capabilities from the project. If junit is required by other dependencies or for certain tests, this exclusion could lead to runtime errors or failed tests.

Consider verifying the impact of this exclusion on the project's tests by ensuring all tests still pass and no necessary dependencies are missing. This can be done by running the project's test suite and checking for any unresolved dependencies or errors related to missing JUnit classes.

aws-cloudwatch-project/pom.xml (1)

127-132: Review the exclusion of JUnit dependency in the CloudWatch project.

The exclusion of the junit artifact from the junit-jupiter dependency is correctly implemented in terms of XML syntax and placement within the dependency block. This change is beneficial for avoiding version conflicts and reducing the dependency tree size. However, it's important to ensure that this exclusion does not lead to missing dependencies that are crucial for the project's tests.

It would be prudent to verify that all tests still function as expected without the excluded junit dependency. This can be done by running the test suite and checking for any failures or issues that could be attributed to missing JUnit classes or version conflicts.

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli merged commit 2f29bad into main Aug 31, 2024
15 checks passed
@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli deleted the sb-apply-practices branch August 31, 2024 08:29
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5ab8f6 and 2547bea.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (13)

14-14: Correct setting for SQL logging.

Setting spring.jpa.show-sql=false is a best practice for production environments to avoid logging sensitive SQL information and reduce log clutter. This change aligns with security and performance best practices.


15-15: Disabling Open Session in View.

Setting spring.jpa.open-in-view=false is a recommended practice to avoid common pitfalls associated with the Open Session in View anti-pattern, such as unexpected database transactions and performance issues. This change enhances the robustness of the application.


17-17: Setting Hibernate DDL mode to none.

Configuring spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=none prevents Hibernate from making unintended changes to the database schema at runtime, which is crucial for production environments to maintain database integrity.


19-19: Setting the JDBC time zone to UTC.

Configuring spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.time_zone=UTC ensures that all date/time operations are consistent across different environments, which is particularly important for applications deployed in multiple regions.


20-20: Disabling Hibernate statistics generation.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.generate_statistics=false helps improve performance by not collecting runtime statistics, which can be resource-intensive.


21-21: Configuring Hibernate batch size.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=25 optimizes the batch processing of SQL statements, which can significantly improve performance when dealing with large volumes of data.


22-22: Enabling ordered inserts.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.order_inserts=true can optimize the order of insert statements for better performance, especially when inserting a large number of entities.


23-23: Enabling ordered updates.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.order_updates=true optimizes the order of update statements, which can reduce deadlock risks and improve database performance.


24-24: Fail on pagination over collection fetch.

Enabling spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.fail_on_pagination_over_collection_fetch=true helps prevent inefficient queries that can lead to performance degradation, by failing fast on bad pagination practices.


25-25: Enabling in-clause parameter padding.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.in_clause_parameter_padding=true can improve query plan caching efficiency by standardizing the size of the IN clause in SQL queries.


26-26: Setting query plan cache size.

Configuring spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.plan_cache_max_size=4096 allows for a larger number of query plans to be cached, which can improve performance by reducing the need for query compilation.


27-27: Disabling auto-commit on the provider level.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.connection.provider_disables_autocommit=true ensures that database transactions are explicitly managed, which can prevent accidental data corruption and improve performance.


28-28: Enabling non-contextual LOB creation.

Setting spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.lob.non_contextual_creation=true is useful for certain databases where LOB handling requires specific configurations to avoid context issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant